Public Decisions Database


This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.

Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.

Case Profile

New Search
First Name Eugene R.
Last Name Bishop
Title Judge
Inquiry No. 161
Court Level Superior Court
County/Appellate District Riverside
Discipline/Determination Other discipline
Decision By Commission
Date of Decision 02/04/2002
Method of Resolution Stipulation
Types of Misconduct Failure to ensure rights
Petition For Review
Summary

In four separate matters, while presiding in juvenile dependence court, Judge Bishop violated the rights of minors, parents and custodial grandparents by depriving them of notice and an opportunity to be heard before the judge ordered a change in custody, the removal of children from the home, or the termination of parental rights. The judge retired from judicial office and agreed not to seek judicial office or sit on assignment. The judge also agreed that this private admonishment could be made public.

Documents

[ NOTICE ]     [ ANSWER ]     [ PRIVATE ADMONISHMENT ]