Public Decisions Database
This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.
Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.
Case Profile
New Search| First Name | Paul M. |
| Last Name | Bryant, Jr. |
| Title | Judge |
| Inquiry No. | |
| Court Level | Superior Court |
| County/Appellate District | San Bernardino |
| Discipline/Determination | Public admonishment |
| Decision By | Commission |
| Date of Decision | 10/27/2008 |
| Method of Resolution | Stipulation |
| Types of Misconduct | Demeanor/decorum On-bench abuse of authority in performance of judicial duties |
| Petition For Review | |
| Summary | In five instances, Judge Bryant failed to be patient, dignified and courteous to those with whom he dealt in an official capacity. In one of the matters, after he became annoyed with the attorney, the judge vacated orders he had just issued in favor of the attorney's client and then recused himself. The judge previously had been disciplined for similar conduct. At the time of the commission's decision, the judge had retired from office. |
| Documents |