Public Decisions Database
This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.
Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.
Case Profile
New Search| First Name | Luis A. |
| Last Name | Cardenas |
| Title | Judge |
| Inquiry No. | 155 |
| Court Level | Superior Court |
| County/Appellate District | Orange |
| Discipline/Determination | Public admonishment |
| Decision By | Commission |
| Date of Decision | 10/03/2000 |
| Method of Resolution | Decision |
| Types of Misconduct | Ex parte communications Gifts/loans/favors/ticket-fixing On-bench abuse of authority in performance of judicial duties |
| Petition For Review | |
| Summary | Judge Cardenas abused his discretion and perpetuated the appearance that two attorney friends were in a special position to influence him by taking actions at their request, often ex parte, in several criminal matters that were not pending before him. |
| Documents | [ NOTICE ] [ ANSWER ] [ PUBLIC ADMONISHMENT ] |