Public Decisions Database


This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.

Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.

Case Profile

New Search
First Name Gerald S.
Last Name Chargin
Title Judge
Inquiry No. 9
Court Level Superior Court
County/Appellate District Santa Clara
Discipline/Determination Censure
Decision By Supreme Court
Date of Decision 06/10/1970
Method of Resolution Decision
Types of Misconduct Bias/appearance of bias toward a particular class
Bias/appearance of bias not directed toward a particular class
Demeanor/decorum
Petition For Review
Summary

During the course of a juvenile court hearing over which he presided, Judge Chargin made improper and inflammatory remarks reflecting upon the juvenile's family and members of his ethnic group, such as: “You are just an animal.” “You ought to commit suicide.” “Maybe Hitler was right. The animals in our society probably ought to be destroyed because they have no right to live among human beings.”

Documents

[ NOTICE ]     [ ANSWER ]     [ DECISION ]