Public Decisions Database
This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.
Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.
Case Profile
New Search| First Name | Gary T. |
| Last Name | Friedman |
| Title | Judge |
| Inquiry No. | |
| Court Level | Superior Court |
| County/Appellate District | Kern |
| Discipline/Determination | Public reproval |
| Decision By | Commission |
| Date of Decision | 06/21/1993 |
| Method of Resolution | Decision |
| Types of Misconduct | Off-bench abuse of office/misuse of court information |
| Petition For Review | |
| Summary | As "practical jokes," Judge Friedman had a snakehead shown to an incarcerated defendant who was fearful of snakes and gave a publicity photo of a famous TV personality to a defendant who was obsessed with the person. |
| Documents | [ PUBLIC REPROVAL ] |