Public Decisions Database
This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.
Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.
Case Profile
New Search| First Name | Patricia |
| Last Name | Gray |
| Title | Judge |
| Inquiry No. | 159 |
| Court Level | Superior Court |
| County/Appellate District | Sonoma |
| Discipline/Determination | Dismissal/reversal |
| Decision By | Commission |
| Date of Decision | 08/27/2002 |
| Method of Resolution | Decision |
| Types of Misconduct | |
| Petition For Review | |
| Summary | In campaign literature, Judge Gray suggested that her opponent, a deputy public defender, was unfit for judgeship because he had defended criminals in his professional role. The judge also appeared to defend her own rulings in cases then on appeal. The case was dismissed after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002) 536 U.S. 765 [122 S.Ct. 2528]. |
| Documents |