Public Decisions Database
This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.
Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.
Case Profile
New Search| First Name | Morris D. |
| Last Name | Jacobson |
| Title | Judge |
| Inquiry No. | |
| Court Level | Superior Court |
| County/Appellate District | Alameda |
| Discipline/Determination | Public Admonishment |
| Decision By | Commission |
| Date of Decision | 07/11/2012 |
| Method of Resolution | Decision |
| Types of Misconduct | Abuse of contempt/sanctions On-bench abuse of authority in performance of judicial duties Demeanor/decorum |
| Petition For Review | |
| Summary | Judge abused the contempt power by detaining an attorney in his courtroom for an hour and a half without adjudicating alleged contempt, and then ordered her to return for a hearing in the afternoon. The judge also abused his authority by ordering her "to spend every waking moment preparing for a preliminary hearing," which the commission also found was demeaning and discourteous. |
| Documents |