Public Decisions Database
This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.
Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.
Case Profile
New Search| First Name | Mark |
| Last Name | Kliszewski |
| Title | Commissioner |
| Inquiry No. | |
| Court Level | Superior Court |
| County/Appellate District | Alameda |
| Discipline/Determination | Public admonishment |
| Decision By | Commission |
| Date of Decision | 10/04/2017 |
| Method of Resolution | Decision |
| Types of Misconduct | Administrative malfeasance/improper comments, treatment of colleagues and staff Bias/appearance of bias toward a particular class Demeanor/decorum Sexual harassment/inappropriate workplace gender comments |
| Petition For Review | |
| Summary | Commissioner permitted court staff to make offensive and inappropriate comments about parties and family members when court not in session. Some remarks related to race, gender. Staff also made jokes about race and engaged in sexual banter. Commissioner made derogatory remarks about a court interpreter to others. |
| Documents | [ DECISION ] |