Public Decisions Database


This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.

Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.

Case Profile

New Search
First Name Kenneth Lynn
Last Name Kloepfer
Title Judge
Inquiry No. 70
Court Level Municipal Court
County/Appellate District San Bernardino
Discipline/Determination Removal from office
Decision By Supreme Court
Date of Decision 11/27/1989
Method of Resolution Decision
Types of Misconduct Abuse of contempt/sanctions
Bias/appearance of bias not directed toward a particular class
Demeanor/decorum
Disqualification/disclosure/post-disqualification conduct
Failure to ensure rights
On-bench abuse of authority in performance of judicial duties
Petition For Review
Summary

Judge Kloepfer displayed a lack of judicial temperament in dealing with litigants, attorneys, witnesses and attaches. He failed to ensure the rights of defendants who appeared before him in criminal cases. Judge Kloepfer abused the contempt power, the power to issue orders to show cause and bench warrants, and the power to make fee orders. He also failed to remain objective in cases before him.

Documents

[ NOTICE ]     [ ANSWER ]     [ DECISION ]