Public Decisions Database


This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.

Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.

Case Profile

New Search
First Name Bernard P.
Last Name McCullough
Title Judge
Inquiry No. 77
Court Level Justice Court
County/Appellate District San Benito
Discipline/Determination Removal from office
Decision By Supreme Court
Date of Decision 07/31/1989
Method of Resolution Decision
Types of Misconduct Decisional delay/false salary affidavits
Failure to ensure rights
Gifts/loans/favors/ticket-fixing
Petition For Review
Summary

Judge McCullough directed a jury to find a defendant guilty in a criminal case. He conducted a trial of two defendants in one defendant's absence and in the absence of their attorneys. The judge used his office to benefit a personal friend by improperly dismissing a criminal charge against the friend. He also failed to sign a judgment form for over six years after a motion for the judgment had been granted and even after he had been publicly censured by the Supreme Court for such failure.

Documents

[ NOTICE ]     [ ANSWER ]     [ DECISION ]