Public Decisions Database
This database contains decisions on all public judicial disciplinary cases since the inception of the commission in 1960. Cases not involving public charges or public discipline remain confidential under the California Constitution and the commission’s rules.
Pursuant to amendments to the Constitution, which took effect in March 1995, the commission is authorized to impose all disciplinary sanctions, subject to discretionary review by the Supreme Court. Prior to that, the Supreme Court had the authority to censure or remove judges from office upon recommendation by the commission.
Case Profile
New Search| First Name | Ronald M. |
| Last Name | Sohigian |
| Title | Judge |
| Inquiry No. | |
| Court Level | Superior Court |
| County/Appellate District | Los Angeles |
| Discipline/Determination | Public admonishment |
| Decision By | Commission |
| Date of Decision | 04/26/2007 |
| Method of Resolution | Decision |
| Types of Misconduct | Abuse of contempt/sanctions Demeanor/decorum |
| Petition For Review | |
| Summary | Judge Sohigian engaged in a practice of abusing his authority in issuing orders to show cause re sanctions. In one matter, the judge treated an attorney in a sarcastic and belittling manner. The judge had been the subject of prior discipline. |
| Documents |